Hi folks,
I thought I’d do another video after all if anyone ever watches them that is π
Kind regards
Leigh
Hi folks,
I thought I’d do another video after all if anyone ever watches them that is π
Kind regards
Leigh
Hi folks,
Just for fun I thought I’d do a quick image quality comparison between my Β£85 TT Artisan 17mm f/1.4 manual focus MFT lens and one of my all time favourite prime lenses the Β£450 M.Zuiko 17mm f/1.8 lens, list prices from the company’s official web stores not including any promotional discounts and shipping charges. In fairness there are reasons other than price why one may prefer the M.Zuiko lens over the TT Artisan lens such as auto focus with manual focus clutch, considerably smaller size (without lens hoods fitted), weight, build quality? etc. but it’s interesting to see how they stack up against each other. Both 100% crops taken in quick succession shot with manual focus, the camera mounted on a tripod, self timer, same lighting, same ISO and same aperture f/5.6. The two lenses have a very slightly different FOV. Identically processed with no sharpening or other corrections applied in post processing.

First the M.Zuiko 17mm f/1.8

Now the TT Artisans 17mm f/1.4

There is, I think, a slight difference, the M.Zuiko is perhaps a tad sharper overall but is it Β£355 sharper?, but with a little sharpening applied in post then that’s easily counteracted, the choice, as always is yours. π
Kind regards
Leigh
Hi everyone,
I thought that I’d put a few of my thoughts to paper so as to speak. Firstly, and in no particular order, are my thoughts on cameras and lenses. Like cars, maybe one’s choice of camera reflects to a certain degree one’s personality. I’m a self-confessed lover of retro designs, thus my passion for my Olympus PEN-F and my latest acquisition, an Olympus PEN E-P5. but not at the exclusion of the modern features that I find most convenient, if I’m anything, it’s that I’m certainly not a Luddite. For me it’s a matter of form and to a certain extent nostalgia but absolutely not form over function. Occasionally I get sick and tired of all the “this camera model/format is better than that/your camera model/format” arguments. I use the term arguments lightly as there’s often absolutely no logic associated with such comments. What there often is is a demonstration of total lack of understanding of even the most basic principles of photography from some people who haven’t even invested a few seconds in learning how their camera works let alone how to use it as a creative tool. That’s all cameras are, tools, and like any other tool, an easy target for a poor workman to blame. It’s a form of tribalism that isn’t unique to camera gear and exists in many other shapes and forms. To sum it up I firmly think that just about ANY modern camera, irregardless of make or model is more than capable of taking excellent photos, and the same goes for most lenses after all, the lens is, in my opinion, ultimately a lot more important than the camera body in achieving results. Taking interesting photos, is, however, a totally different matter.
So that leads me onto lenses. I have a nice collection of lenses for my chosen system that I’ve steadily acquired over the years. Unlike camera bodies where one does generally get more features with more costly models, whether one has a use for them or not is another matter, lenses aren’t so easy defined. I have a few “Pro” badged lenses, they are good lenses and they are weather-sealed which I sometimes find useful but I also have many budget-friendly lenses which are more than capable of producing excellent image quality that is very often impossible to distinguish from their “Pro” stable-mates in real world terms, and I’m not talking about all those laboratory testing type sites full of graphs and charts. Sure build quality is a big issue if one chucks them in and out of a bag all the time but I’ve never had a problem with any of my lenses, they’ve all served me very well as I look after them and they look after me. I simply don’t believe that the difference in optical quality between cheaper and more expensive lenses can, as some might have one believe, be justified in terms of price alone. I have achieved optically excellent results time and again from lenses which, if one chose to believe the reviews, were only fit for the dustbin.
Zooms versus primes, an argument as old as the hills. I used to be a dedicated user of prime lenses and I’m still very happy with mine but a big component of my thinking was based on the old zoom lenses that I was using many years ago which were inferior in just about every respect compared to prime lenses of the time, it’s a completely different story today. I find that I’ve been using zoom lenses a lot more than prime lenses over recent years. There are three principle reasons for this, firstly, I want to frame the image as I want it when composing the shot, I don’t want to habitually crop in post-processing, why have a high resolution sensor and then crop a large chuck of this and throw it away?. Secondly, it’s often difficult to impossible to change positions to frame as I wish and thirdly, by the time I’ve fumbled around changing lenses, assuming of course that I have the lens that I want in my bag, the moment has long since passed. There is also a fourth reason and that’s simply, in my chosen type of photography, one rarely seems to have the right prime lens on the camera at the right time π and lastly there’s also the question of weight, something that’s very important to me, it’s a simple equation, more glass = more combined weight = more fatigue.
Lastly, I watched a very interesting video the other day on the theme of originality in photography and how some folks like to copy the style of another photographer in the belief that this makes for better images. I think that the exact opposite is true. As you all know I love processing my images more so than taking them. This is where one can experiment to one’s heart’s delight. I really like to think that if I have any style it is that I don’t have a style that I stick to ad-nauseum. What’s the point of that?, where’s the fun in that?. If I did so then I’d be bored faster than you can say the word. One of the joys in photography for me is that it gives me a fabulous artistic freedom to do what I like and not what some erroneously believe is a guaranteed pathway to an award winning formula.
Well, that’s enough from me, I very much look forward to hearing your views on the subject.
Kind regards,
Leigh
Hi folks,
Test shot, PEN-F and TT Artisans 17mm f/1.4 lens. Bognor seafront. 5-frame handheld HDR, I really like this lens.

https://www.flickr.com/photos/leighkemp/51290625577/in/dateposted-public/lightbox/

All the best,
Leigh
Hi everyone,
I[‘ve Just taken delivery one month ahead of schedule! of my new TT Artisans 17mm f/1.4 lens. My friend Jimmy Cheng was right, this lens is very sharp. My only slight criticism and it’s not a big one and something that I’ve noticed with other Chinese MFT lenses is that it is a very tight fit but the quality, especially stopped down to about f/5.6 is outstanding and no hit of chromatic aberation!, I’m impressed and looking forward to being able to get out and properly put it through its paces. A quick test pic as I ‘m housebound today. and a 100% crop.


Kind rergards
Leigh
Hi everyone,
I picked up one of these bags https://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/B06XVSZ128/ref=ppx_yo_dt_b_asin_title_o01_s00?ie=UTF8&psc=1
It’s quite nice for the money, probably not the best made bag in the world and highly unlikely to last you a lifetime but it’ll last a fair while and it is lightweight (one of my main pre-requisites) and fairly versatile and roomy. I added a CADEN padded camera insert that I had lying around and also a patch and some carabiners to taste. Not show in the picture below, it also has a large zip-up inside pocket at the back. I very much doubt if it’s water-proof but my National Geographic NG A2560 rain cover fits it very well.
I’ve also ordered one of their tactical MOLLE Phone Pouch Bag Gear Waist Belt Packs (catchy title) π https://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/B07Q2VJQGC/ref=ppx_yo_dt_b_asin_title_o00_s00?ie=UTF8&psc=1 to go one one end. This is detachable and will attach to a belt and serve as second pouch to hold extra stuff, a smallish lens, a mobile phone or maybe second camera like my TG-5 and spare batteries etc..

Small, shallow, vertical opening zip pocket on the left, I’ve put business cards in there. Double pocket, one with zip into which I’ve stored my rain cover and one larger pocket beneath it secured with buckle into which I’ve put my NEEWER 4 battery pouch. MOLLE loops and built in carabiner and a velcro loop patch.

Small side pocket with MOLLE loops.

Large back pocket probably best suited for flat items such travel paperwork, grey cards etc..

End with MOLLE loops to which I’m intending to attach the separate pouch that I ordered.

Inside with the CADEN camera insert fitted. The grey pouch on the end contains my small lightweight fold up rucksack.
NOTE the insert doesn’t come with the bag, I purchased this separately.
Kind regards
Leigh
Hi everyone,
Heath Robinson would like this π , my latest pistol grip mod, added one of my SLIK ball heads with quick release and an optional detachable stand. Obviously this isn’t going to work with big heavy kit and needs an even surface. I’m looking for a similar base but a tad bigger but it works with my lightweight gear like my PEN-F and smaller lenses.

Best wishes,
Leigh
Hi everyone, most of you already know that I like to experiment with my gear. As the pistol grip has a tripod thread on the bottom I attached it to two of my small tabletop tripods to try it out. The only thing that I dislike about the grip is the positioning of the lock button which is far too easily accidentally pressed and, as I don’t require it for my interests, I’m going to glue it in the off or unlocked position.


Kind regards
Leigh
PS. The lock button is no longer a problem since I super glued it π
Hi everyone,
Firstly, two of my most recent shots both taken in Bognor Regis.

https://www.flickr.com/photos/leighkemp/51244379074/in/dateposted-public/lightbox/

https://www.flickr.com/photos/leighkemp/51249822739/in/dateposted-public/lightbox/
Now for a fun shot that I did recreating an Olympus magazine advert from the 70’s originally featuring Peter Sellers with an OM-1 camera which, incidentally, was my first 35mm film SLR. For this I mounted my Lumix 35-100mm to my PEN-F with a pistol grip.

Finally, I bought a JJC HR series pistol grip, circa Β£20 which I think will come in handy with longer lenses and maybe video if and when I do any to which I’ve added a two piece quick release plate, a strap eyelet to the bottom of the handle and one of my removable wrist straps. The grip requires a cable, sold separately, to fit one’s make/model of camera, I already had one as it was the same type that fitted my JJC wireless remote.

Kind regards
Leigh
Hi everyone,
For my last two local trips out I decided to take my relatively little used Olympus E-PL5 camera and Lumix 12-32mm as I had other things that I needed to do and carry and I didn’t want to carry around some of my other somewhat more bulky camera gear. I dug out my tiny Samsonite Trekking camera bag and managed to squeeze in a fair bit of gear.
Firstly, to get a sense of scale, here’s the bag sitting on top of an A4 sheet of paper.

In the main compartment my E-PL5 with lens attached and my EV-4 electronic viewfinder ready to attach and in the top mesh pocket, a 58mm ND filter.

In the the front compartment, my Holux GPS data-logger, two spare camera batteries and, in the front zip-up mesh pocket, my Nikon Coolpix A-100 camera with my Manfrotto mini tripod attached in a red waterproof pouch so I even managed to fit in a backup camera!!. π

Lastly I attached a very small tabletop tripod through the two belt loops and used one of my handy Thinktank red-whips to secure it tightly. Behind this is another zip-up pocket into which I put a few lens wipes sachets and a lens cleaning cloth.

Amazing what one can get into such a tiny bag. π . As for the weight, I don’t know, it was so light that it didn’t even register on my electronic bathroom scales!.
Kind regards,
Leigh