My latest camera :)

Hi everyone,

Hi everyone, spotted this in a local charity shop for Β£4. A Halina 35X 35mm film camera to add to my vintage camera ornamental collection. Judging by its weight it’s made out of depleted Uranium,. If I ever need a paperweight for use in hurricane force winds then this baby is up for the job. πŸ™‚ Made in 1959 the same year as me it’s probably in better condition and has aged better. 😦 The one thing we do have in common, apart from our advancing years, is that our moving parts are very stiff to move. πŸ™‚

Kind regards

Leigh

A few shots taken with my Lumix 14mm f/2.5 lens.

Hi,

I took my Lumix 14mm f/2.5mm lens for a stroll on and around the Pier in Worthing yesterday to remind myself how good this versatile little lens is. This was one of the first micro four thirds lenses I bought and still great value for money and more than capable of producing excellent results. All shots taken at ISO 200, f/5.6, the detail in the full-sized images is outstanding. Some 100% crops included.

All the best,

Leigh

Easily remove a stuck memory card.

Hi all,

A bit of an odd post this one but some time back I got a memory card stuck in one of my PEN cameras. It was my own stupid fault as I was inserting it in a hurry and absent-mindedly put it in the wrong way round front to back. As the ridge on the card was on the wrong side I had nothing to get a purchase on and no space to get my finger and thumb in the space in the hinged battery and memory card compartment. Fortunately this was at home and I used some tweezers to easily remove the card. Since then I carry a pair in my camera bag, I think that I can live with the extra weight πŸ™‚ as, sooner or later, I’m going to do it again when out and about without anything to hand to remove it making it game over. Needle-nosed pliers would probably have done it too but I don’t want to accommodate these in my camera bag. There I said it was an odd post but, nether the less, hopefully a useful one, as the old saying goes forewarned is forearmed. πŸ™‚

Kind regards

Leigh

Add on pouch for my Billingham Hadley Digital Camera Bag.

Hi,

I’ve ordered one of their Avea7 add-on side pocket pouches for my Billingham Hadley Digital camera bag. One can attach one of these pouches to either end of the bag if desired and alternatively the pouch can be attached to a belt. They make three different sizes (Avea3, Avea5 and Avea7) to fit this bag, I chose this model, the largest of the three, because it should be big enough to accommodate some extra items, predominantly additional rechargeable batteries, a small USB power bank including the one built into my RAVPower SD card backup/Travel Router etc. that air travel regulations dictate that one’s obliged to pack in one’s hand luggage and a backup USB camera battery charger. I’m also gradually revising my gear requirements for the big photographic adventure that I’m planning for later this year, more on that another time. It can be detached when these items aren’t required to be carried around all the time.

The pouch can then be used on one’s belt for going out with just a small lighter weight one camera-one lens like my Olympus PEN-F fitted with one of my small pancake lenses such as my Lumix 14mm, 20mm or 12-32mm as I like to do in the evenings. I like this idea a lot as I want to keep my bag as compact and lightweight as possible for every day usage with the option to make it expandable as and when required. In the past I’ve travelled with a larger bag and packed a smaller one for the occasions when I want to just take out a camera and lens so experience tells me that this idea will work very well, probably safer as it’s less conspicuous than carrying a larger bag, it will also welcomely take the weight off of one’s neck and shoulders.

The pouches are manufactured to the same high standards as their bags and use the same padding, leather and brass fittings and three-layered waterproof canvas or fibrenyte material and offer the same level of protection for one’s gear. The pouch also has a small half-height internal pocket in which one could put a lens cleaning cloth, a couple of lens wet wipe sachets, a spare lens cap, a filter or similar sized items.

Kind regards

Leigh

Olympus M.Zuiko 9-18mm f/4-5.6

Hi everyone,

I’ve owned this lens for quite a few years now and never really written much about it. With its 18mm-36mm full-frame equivalent focal length range it makes a great travel/walkabout lens if one likes taking street shots, landscapes, architectural and interior shots. Its very small and light at 154 grams and 49.3mm when in it’s collapsed transit position as shown above. Some may not like its plastic construction, although it does have a metal lens mount, or its switch to lock the lens. You don’t use the switch to extend the lens it is used when one wants to fully retract the lens and lock it in this position. It’s also not a very fast lens at f/4 at its widest and f/5.6 at its tele setting but it is very sharp and extremely versatile. It covers the popular full-frame equivalent wide angle focal lengths of 21mm, 24mm, 28mm and 35mm. As a useful bonus the lens accepts 52mm filters and the lens hood is a bayonet-fitting aftermarket one from JJC at a much lower cost than the proprietary one from Olympus, I refuse to pay Β£30 for a bit of plastic when they should be included with any lens. I can thoroughly recommend this lens for any Micro Four Thirds system users wanting to get a compact, lightweight ultra-wide angle lens at an affordable price especially if, like me, you find one second hand at a good price. Here’s a few shots I’ve taken with this lens. Over the years I’ve taken some of my all time favourite shots with this lens.

Kind regards

Leigh

Billingham Hadley Digital camera bag, first thoughts.

HI,

I took delivery of my new camera bag. The bag, is, as I knew it would be, superbly well made. It’s in excellent condition without a mark on it, a great second hand buy. One of the two internal dividers was missing but that doesn’t bother me for the price paid and they do spares if I choose to get more. A brilliant added bonus was the inclusion of the matching SP40 padded non-slip leather shoulder pad which, if bought as an accessory, is quite expensive. The big appeal of this bag, apart from the excellent quality of materials and manufacturing, is the extremely well padded plush interior with padded top, the good-sized front pocket which holds quite a bit and its weather proofing and it should be perfect for my day-to-day requirements, also no more zips, velcro and fiddling around fitting and removing rain covers!. I chose to try it for size with my Olympus PEN-F camera fitted with my M.Zuiko 12-45mm zoom with lens hood attached and it fits very well as the bag has some height to it which is another reason why I wanted it. Below a few shots of the bag and contents, if I was packing for a lengthier trip I’d probably squeeze in a small USB power bank and an extra spare camera battery into the front pocket and additionally pack one of my small, fast standard prime lenses in the main compartment if I get another padded divider.

PEN-F camera with 12-45mm lens attached, small four filter pouch, neoprene pouch containing lens brush, lens wipes and microfiber cloth, filter wrench as I’ve started to use filters more frequently of late, Tile Mate bluetooth tracker, spare camera battery plus two extra SDHC cards in a waterproof battery case, small cheap MP3 player and bluetooth ear buds as I occasionally like to listen to some music on my travels.

Kind regards

Leigh

I bought a Billingham Hadley Digital camera bag.

Hi,

Back in the late 70s I bought one of the first Billingham 550 model camera bags ever made eagerly waiting weeks for it to be made and delivered as they were on lengthy back order such was their demand. It was a great bag, pretty large, quite heavy, but aged about twenty I was able to carry a lot more weight than I can now, it was really beautifully made and, at that time, it ticked all the boxes for me for a camera bag. It certainly wasn’t cheap even then given what I earned in those days but it was such a quality camera bag, it just screamed quality the second that one laid one’s eyes on it. I’ve been looking for a small camera bag specifically for a trip that I’m planning for later this year and I re-discovered their bags and I found one of these second hand at a very tempting price so I’ve ordered it. For my minimalistic requirements carrying just a small micro four thirds camera, one or two small lenses and a few essential accessories, spare batteries etc., I think that this bag will fit the bill very nicely. It’s pretty nigh impossible to find a bad review of Billingham camera bags, they’ve been making bags for fifty years and my experiences back then would bare this out completely. A quality UK product made from top quality materials, multi-layered waterproof canvas without the need for a separate rain cover, protective well padded interior and dividers with leather and brass fittings, arguably the best made and longest lasting camera bags that money can buy and the perfect stylish but still discrete companion to compliment my passion for retro-styled cameras and lenses πŸ™‚ with the added bonus that to anyone not in the know it doesn’t look very much like your typical camera bag.

External Dimensions: W210mm (8¼”) x D130mm (5⅛”) x H210mm (8¼”) Internal Dimensions: W180mm (7⅛”) x D100mm (4β€³) x H170mm (6¾”) Capacity: 2.50 litres (0.09 feetΒ³) Weight: 0.47 kgs (1.04 lbs)

Kind regards

Leigh

Analogue and digital worlds.

Hiya,

Using my manual focus lenses quite a bit recently and, maybe even more so, my manual flash gun from time to time has made me stop and think about the whole analogue digital thing. I don’t necessarily mean the quality of digital vs analogue I’m thinking more about the experience. I’ve readily embraced most modern technology in all my interests but, trying as hard as I can to set nostalgia aside for a moment, there are things that I do miss. Digital gear has made my life simpler in many ways, I can play my digital drums to my heart’s delight with next to no noise and just a pair of headphones on and I can choose from a huge selection of kits for different genres and further customise them to suit my personal taste in a way that I could never afford to do. I can and have talked to other radio amateurs all over the world without having to spend huge amounts of money on transceiver equipment and having to have large external aerials, prone as they are to come crashing down in high winds, sadly I talk from experience 😦 . I still marvel at being able to get 1000 or more images on a tiny memory card and see and work on the images pretty much immediately, I can download music straight to my PC or phone and hear it immediately all of which is more than just a matter of convenience.

However, there are things that I miss, so much of the tech. seems to promote not having to be bothered to learn any theory or, to put it another way an “I don’t care how it does it, it just does it” attitude which I think is a great pity. I appreciate that not everyone wants to get “under the bonnet” and invest any time an effort in learning what makes things tick and how to get the best out of one’s gear and one’s pastimes but it’s something that’s always interested me and the learning process can be incredibly rewarding and relevant. For all of it’s convenience there’s still something enjoyable about slowing down and seeing a shot come into focus or going to a record shop and thumbing through the used (I can no longer afford new) πŸ™‚ “vinyl” on the shelves, spotting an unexpected find and coming away with something in one’s hand. I guess that it’s things like this that have driven the recent trendy revival in film cameras and records decks etc.?.

I’ve tried my best to separate nostalgic feelings from convenience but I’ve found that it can become somewhat detached and soulless if one lets it. Talking of record decks or “vinyl decks” as they’ve now come to be known, I wonder how many people who buy them even take time to understand or bother setting them up correctly so as not to plough furrows in one’s records? or see the arm go skating off of them, I certainly would at today’s ridiculous prices!. in the same way as how many are interested in the exposure triangle and it’s importance in understanding and mastering basic photographic techniques?, how many digital cameras ever come off of full auto mode and/or auto-focus?.

Well, that’s my ten pennies worth πŸ™‚ , we live in a digital world with all of its many advantages and I wouldn’t put the clock back and I’m not dismissing modern technology out of hand much of which has opened up interesting new possibilities but I’m glad that I’m old enough to remember and still savour technology from the analogue world that I grew up in which taught me so much and given me so many enjoyable and rewarding experiences which I feel, on balance, has enriched my life. As a slight aside it’s interesting when I’m out and about with my retro-looking camera gear observing the looks I get from people of different generations, as a generalism, Baby Boomers and Generation X seem to be nostalgically interested in the look of the gear, Millennials/Generation Y seem to think that it looks “cool” and “interesting” whilst Generation Z and even more so, Generation Alpha, largely dismiss it (and probably me) as old and crappy tech. πŸ™‚

Kind regards

Leigh

Processing TTArtisan 23mm f/1.4 images.

Hi everyone,

I’ve now had a chance to work on setting up a preset to process my images taken with this lens. Below, before, shot as RAW with no adjustments and after the processed image. Straight out of camera the images look somewhat soft and lacklustre lacking particularly in brightness, sharpness, contrast and saturation. Granted that it was quite a cold dull day, it wasn’t quite that dull and depressing!. πŸ™‚ I might tweak things a bit further as I get more experience with this lens but this’ll do as a starting point. I didn’t notice any chromatic aberration, fringing or vignetting at f/5.6 which I think is pretty impressive for a lens at this price point. It definitely pays handsome dividends investing in some time and effort in processing to bring out the best in this lens but this is something that I habitually do anyway irregardless of the camera and lens.

A 100% crop from the edited image:

Kind regards

Leigh

TTArtisan 23mm f/1.4 lens test shots.

Hi everyone,

I took my new TTArtisan 23mm f/1.4 lens for a test drive this morning in Chichester. All shots taken on my Olympus PEN-F camera at f/5.6 plus Kenko 1.0 black mist filter, with minimal processing for sharpness, noise reduction where appropriate, correction for converging verticals and processed with a Fuji Astia+ film emulation LUT. Not bad for an Β£83 lens. πŸ™‚ I could improve more with additional processing but I wanted to keep things as basic and simple as possible for the purpose of testing. As I thought it might be this lens is a lot of fun to shoot with. Zone focus at about 7m at f/5.6 and everything is acceptably sharp from approx. 3m to infinity. The lens is a bit soft even at f/5.6 more so with the filter fitted but nothing that cannot easily be corrected in post. I only wanted the filter on for the interior shots taken inside the Cathedral.

Kind regards,

Leigh