Photo processing software licensing

Hi,

Some years ago I promptly gave up Adobe products when they went over to a licensing model. I object strongly to having to pay and pay again to keep using a piece of software, I’m happy to pay a one-off payment for upgraded features where I feel that they represent good value for money and are of benefit to me or a one-off upgrade to a new software version where it offers sufficient useful extra functionality but to have to pay for the same upgrade features over and over again annually is something that I strongly object to. For some some years I’ve used Sklyum products including every version of their Luminar software, their Aurora HDR software and many one-off paid add-ons eg. LUTs etc.. I note that they now do an annual “Season Pass” which one has to pay in order to retain some of their add-on extra features that one’s already paid out for when one’s “pass” expires. as well as some extra features that I have absolutely no use for. For this reason I shall no longer be spending any money on their products. These companies seem to think that one has unlimited funds and very deep pockets, they want to try being reliant on a UK state pension!. Skylum marketed heavily on their software being “Pay Once” and not a subscription but they, like the vast majority of their competitor have done are moving in that direction which I find personally totally unacceptable.

Kind regads

Leigh

8 thoughts on “Photo processing software licensing

  1. I l

    I do not mind paying for subscriptions for my photography software. I like the frequent updates. Most of all, I like the 24/7 tech support. I use the AI tools and other features that would not be available without a subscription. I think of it like my utility bill.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a reply to Sherry Felix Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.